Here’s a sports axiom–the level of fighting tolerated by a sport is inversely proportional to the number of black folks in the sport.
Don’t believe me? Let’s order by proportion of black players. Going greatest to least.
Basketball
Football
Baseball
Hockey
Now, let’s look the levels on which fighting is tolerated in sports. Going from greatest to least.
Hockey
Baseball
Football
Basketball
Challenge that assumption as you like, seeing how it’s difficult to measure tolerance. However, I think that’s a pretty solid premise.
With that in mind–have you noticed how ESPN has handled this here recent hockey brawl?
On Monday, I saw that SportsCenter was teasing some hockey fight that “[I] won’t want to miss.” It was then described as a YouTube sensation. Once the video came on, it was clear that the spectacle wasn’t the massive brawl itself, but the sucker punch that Jonathan Roy was set to deliver to his unsuspecting goaltending counterpart.
This was a punk move to the nth degree. Granted, I don’t understand how this dude was just leaning against the goal while someone skated at him during a brouhaha, but being a sucker doesn’t mean you deserve to be suckerpunched. Dude skates off the ice, starts another fight, then throws two birds to the sky on the way to the locker room.
This was teased as “can’t miss” action for at least half an hour.
In the segment, it was mentioned that Roy apologized for his actions. Nope. Turns out he apologized for cursing on camera and the birds. No apology for the actual fighting.
The next day, Roy and his coach, father Patrick Roy, were suspended along with others involved in the brawl. It seems the elder Roy encouraged his son to run up on the opposing goaltender.
All of a sudden, the fight was bad, bad, bad. I wish I had a clip for you, because it was a complete 180. The language of ESPN’s coverage changed completely over 24 hours, as if someone had to remember that, you know, fighting is supposed to be bad.
I mean, I don’t remember this being billed as can’t-miss fun on ESPN. Nor that whole Artest, Malice in the Palace thing. And say what you want about Artest and the other Pacers going into the stands, but you gotta at least say that fight was fair. Think it’s deplorable to fight a fan? Is it somehow better to fight someone that isn’t doing anything to you? Didn’t think so.
I mention this because of a conversation I had with someone about the Lebron James-Gisele Bundchen cover of Vogue. The gentleman was asking me if discussions of race were being set back because some complained about a cover that most white people didn’t think was racist in any way. To me, the problem was that no one saw that there could be an issue. No one at Vogue thought maybe, just maybe, having a scowling black man scoop up a pretty blond white woman might look a little wrong. The folks at Vogue didn’t mean harm. That doesn’t obscure the fact that, on some level, harm was done, considering how undeniably that photo mirrors a dreadful stereotype of black men. I’m not set to protest at Vogue over this, but something was amiss.
There is danger in writing off the things people don’t notice as being no big deal. I’m frequently amazed at how much some white people don’t notice when it comes to issues of race, and even more frustrated by the defensiveness offered in response to legitimate discourse on race in America. An attack on racism isn’t an attack on white people, nor is it even necessarily an attack of a person that offers a racist statement. An attack on racism is just that–a resistance offered to the most pervasive force in American society, the one that has defined this country’s history like no other.
The difference in the way this hockey brawl was handled vis-a-vis the Miami-FIU debacle or the Malice in the Palace wasn’t even subtle. The media was ready to call FEMA to stop Artest and Stephen Jackson. But the biggest media outlet in sports salivated at the thought of showing the world a hockey fight whose centerpiece was an act of cowardice.
These are the things that everyone has to notice. They’re right in our faces. So many acknowledge racism in the abstract, but they don’t ever seem to notice it when it’s right in front of them. On some level, someone on the back end realized that celebrating this brawl might not be the best look. We still need to consider why anyone thought it was a good look in the first place.
The difference in the ways violence is covered across sports is racist. From the coverage of Chad Kreuter’s trip into the stands in Wrigley Field to retrieve his cap to Rob Ray demolishing a fan that came on the ice, there are examples to prove the way fighting is covered is different based on which sport we’re dealing with. Call the ordering exercise above a coincidence if you like, but I think you’ll be wrong if you do so.
No, these aren’t groundbreaking observations. That doesn’t mean they should remain unspoken, though. These are the subtle, problematic things that continue to fuel the ridiculous perceptions of black people, and these are the things that must be discussed openly and honestly.
And now.
March 26, 2008
Comments